Commissioners get “good news” from tourism council

May 15, 2005

By Linda Bailey Potter / Staff Writer, Alpine Avalanche

Brewster County Tourism Council (BCTC) Executive Director Mike Davidson presented his quarterly report to the Brewster County Commissioners Court at their regular meeting Monday, May 9.

Davidson said there is good news, and reported that first quarter tourism tax receipts for 2005 are up 20 percent. Overall, the tax revenue is up by 50 percent in the last four years. He reported that April has been as good as March.

This reflects what local hotel and motel owners have been reporting-that after Spring Break, business has not let up. It has historically declined after the March rush.

BCTC is planning some enhancements on their website to update information, photos and to improve readability. “It will make navigation easier, ” he said.

They are also continuing with their involvement in regional tourism associations and with their primary partnerships in Fort Stockton and Van Horn. They have also increased their schedule of travel shows to promote Big Bend tourism.

Davidson reported on a series of interpretive signs that will be funded 50/50 by BCTC and the Rio Grande Institute. Two signs will be at the Marathon Post, one sign at Historic Terlingua, two on Hwy. 170 in the new construction area, two on Hwy. 385 south of Marathon, and two signs on Hwy. 118 south of Alpine.

Davidson and Ty Fain of the Rio Grande Institute made a proposal presentation to the annual Bi-National Bridge Committee regarding La Linda Bridge, located on the central/eastern border of Brewster County. It is hoped that tourism can be developed in this area.

The proposal is to meet in Ciudad Acuna, Mexico, south of Del Rio, with interested people on both sides of the border, and then to make a presentation to the governors of Texas and the state of Coahuila, Mexico.

“It is of the greatest interest to Brewster County that the land issues surrounding the La Linda bridge be resolved as soon as possible. This is the number one long-term issue, and it should be aggressively pursued,” Davidson said in his written report.

Comments? E-mail writer@alpineavalanche.com


Regional effort to enhance tourists’ experience in Far West Texas

March 31, 2005

EDITORIAL NOTE AND UPDATE 

I was about to “pull” this out-of-date entry but then decided to leave it and say something. TxDOT has pulled the rug from under hundreds of locally conceived projects to boost tourism and preservation of hisotric and scenic sites. The funds destined for Texas communities under the transportation enhacement section of the National Transportation Act have evaporated, some say because the federal government cut Texas short, others say that Texas, when faced with the need for a cut-back on transportation chose the enhancement program over others that have a “higher priority” (stronger lobby?).

At any rate, the exciting initiative described in this 2005 post is dead, or at least dormant and that is truly sad.  Equally depressing to me is the fact that there were virtually no howls of protest from elected officials from across the state. I don’t know about the rest of the state but in Far West Texas people seem to treat news like this like they do a dry-spell, it is something that just happens. 

Ty Fain on February 24, 2008

By Tyrus G. Fain, Rio Grande Institute

Original Link

Here is a “clean growth” economic opportunity that shouldn’t be allowed to slip away. It concerns the scenic sites and byways along highways in the Trans-Pecos and Big Bend region, especially those included in the itineraries, loops and trails that have been recommended for enhancement and promotion by the Rio Grande Institute’s tourism assets initiative.
There are more than 100 such identified locations, and they range across the spectrum of resource-based tourism – from scenic mountain vistas to old mercury mines on the river, from abandoned military posts to birding sites and riparian trails.

These are priceless assets for the future of the region’s tourism economy and can become the backbone of the Texas Mountain Trail. Most sites are alongside roadways, so sound proposals for signage or site improvements should be able to compete for access to transportation enhancement funds from the new federal Transportation Equity Act (last known as TEA-21).
Based on past years’ allocations, Texas will have access to well over $50 million yearly in enhancement funds over the coming six years. Hopefully, the region’s communities and “gateway” neighbors will unite behind having a fair share of that money invested in regional sites, byways and gateway facilities that can fuel further growth of a sustainable tourism economy.
Visitors and residents drive thousands of miles along roadways through the Big Bend and across the Trans-Pecos and remain largely unaware of what lies around them – wildlife, historic sites, wonderful and unusual natural features.

We need to provide people with more opportunities to slow down, stop for a while, perhaps stay another day and enjoy the unusual travel experiences offered by this area’s unique mix of desert, mountains and frontier history. This “slow down, stay awhile” approach is a common but somewhat elusive objective shared in tourism circles.

One concrete and proven way to capture travelers’ time and attention is roadway enhancement through construction of turnouts, roadside parks, visitors centers, interpretive signs and exhibits and historical markers. Thanks to years of research and collaborative planning work sponsored by the Rio Grande Institute, Sul Ross State University and others, a foundation has been laid to develop an informed and cohesive roadway enhancement plan to support a regional tourism development strategy. Enlightened leadership from local officials and regional bodies working with the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) can make this happen.

Here is how it can work. The new six-year transportation reauthorization bill is expected to clear Congress by summer and be signed into law by President Bush. Each state is to have a defined share of more than $284 billion, but whether a community or region gets a nice slice or just a few crumbs from their state allocation will be influenced by the initiatives taken by local officials and groups.

The money will come to TxDOT under a formula that brings back to the states what was paid into the federal government, setting aside a portion (roughly 10 percent) for “enhancement projects.” According to TxDOT’s Web site, those are transportation-related projects that “contribute to the livelihood of communities, promote the quality of our environment and enhance the aesthetics of our roadways.”

As this new round of enhancement funding becomes available, local communities and TxDOT will be challenged to come up with projects that fit the program’s funding guidelines while providing long-term benefits for quality of life and economic well being. The idea is for benefits to reach those who live along our roadways, as well as to those who drive over them. For the Trans-Pecos/Big Bend region, this timely challenge is loaded with opportunities on a far larger scale than we have seen in years past.

Most of us have seen the fine work TxDOT can do to enhance our roadways – roadside parks, pull-overs, visitor centers like the one at Langtry, special sites like the Marfa Lights facility, numerous roadside parks and, of course, the hundreds of historical markers along our highways.
This has been encouraged and facilitated by legislators such as State Rep. Pete Gallego and State Sen. Frank Madla, state agencies, county governments and regional councils of government, not to mention chambers of commerce and tourism councils. Without seeming presumptuous or greedy, our region can ask for more from the coming funding cycle.

The enhancement activities that may be eligible for funding over the next six years are extensive. Besides scenic or historic site highway facilities, they include welcome and tourist centers, roadside landscaping, historic preservation, facilities and safety programs for pedestrians and bicyclists, rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, archeological planning and research and establishment of transportation museums. Funds can even be used for projects that reduce water pollution from highway runoff or lessen road kills by opening crossing corridors for wildlife.

With such an extensive menu of possible projects, communities may be tempted to compile their own wish lists and compete with one another for TxDOT’s attention. Some good could come from that approach, but a better way will be for the communities to work together with TxDOT and other interested agencies to knit enhancement projects together into a coherent program that supports a regional strategy for travel and tourism development. That is where the groundwork laid by the RGI/SRSU research and planning comes into play, and stakeholders, such as the Texas Historical Commission and Texas Parks and Wildlife, can play a vital role.

In 2002, the Texas Legislature appropriated funds to Sul Ross State University to develop a strategic plan for development of a tourism-based economy in the 15 counties contiguous to the Texas-Mexico border. SRSU asked the Rio Grande Institute to secure professional assessments of sites with potential for becoming tourist destinations and make recommendations for action. One of those recommendations involved creation of a series of itineraries – “loops” that visitors to the Big Bend and Trans-Pecos can reach through the state’s highway network.

Last year, with support from the Rio Grande Council of Governments, the institute was awarded a grant from the U.S. Economic Development Administration for a Tourism Asset Development project that would make the suggested loops part of a tourism development strategy for the six-county area encompassed by Brewster, Culberson, El Paso, Hudspeth, Jeff Davis and Presidio counties. Other Trans-Pecos and “gateway” counties can and should be added to make this a coherent regional strategy for an enhancement program.

Working with local stakeholders and an inter-disciplinary team of experts, the institute has compiled the basic interpretive material needed for signs, exhibits, brochures and promotional pieces pertaining to waypoints on five itineraries in the region. Their provisional names are: Big Bend/Chisos Loop, Presidio-Pinto Canyon Loop, Guadalupe Mountains Loop, El Paso Desert-Mountain Loop and Davis Mountains Loop. Descriptions of each loop are on the Internet at www.bordermountaintrails.com.

The itineraries contain more than 100 individual sites pertaining to geology, history, archeology, birds and wildlife and also offer several suggested stops with extraordinary scenic vistas; most are situated on or near state or federal roadways and currently provide no stopping place, exhibits, signs or information for the traveler.

This extensive body of interpretive material is now becoming a key element of tourism development plans by organizations such as the Big Bend & Texas Mountains Tourism Association, Brewster County Tourism Council and chambers of commerce in many Big Bend cities and towns. It is also providing an early interpretive resource on the area for the Texas Mountain Trail initiative recently incorporated into the heritage program of the Texas Historical Commission.
The new incarnation of TEA-21, soon to be set up by Congress, will give local and regional groups an unprecedented opportunity to come together, to focus on local assets and use information on hand to craft a comprehensive regional roadway enhancement strategy. This effort should go beyond enhancing key sites on the five proposed loops and include a number of other transportation infrastructure enhancements important for a regional strategy that stretches over the six years that funding will be accessible. Among them are: Gateway centers and signage that lead travelers to the network of the loops’ digital information kiosks and “Wi-Fi hotspots,” offering maps and information; roadside parks and wayside pull-offs with interpretive exhibits and signage pertaining to nature, history and culture; and maps, guidebooks and interpretive materials (print, digital and Web-based).

It’s easy to envisage a network of signs, pull-offs, parks and exhibits and to appreciate how they could enhance the experience of travelers, but without the kind of funding promised by the new transportation act, that is a pipe dream.

But the mere prospect of money is not enough to create a plan. Regional planning bodies such as the Big Bend & Texas Mountains Tourism Association and the several councils of government need to meet and carefully examine what can be funded under transportation enhancement programs and adapt their planning accordingly. They and local governments should be ready to extend a hand when TxDOT begins seeking local input on enhancement priorities.
Building and sustaining the community consensus and partnerships needed to create a regional enhancement program will require more than meetings.

La Entrada al Pacifico gained traction when some business and political leaders were ready to cross boundaries and go beyond business as usual. A successful enhancement program for a regional tourism initiative will require similar engagement by our region’s leaders and TxDOT planners.

As Brewster County’s tourism guru Mike Davidson says, it requires a look at “the bigger picture and the bigger opportunity for the greater good.”

Ty Fain is the founder of The Rio Grande Institute in Marathon. He was instrumental in the creation of a recent book, The Rio Grande, edited by author Jan Reid and published by The University of Texas Press. He can be reached at TFain13345@aol.com


News Release: State Department Provides Roadmap for Reopening Big Bend’s La Linda Bridge

February 14, 2004

Marathon:

More progress has been reported on having the bridge at La Linda reopened for cross-border tourism traffic. On returning from a trip to Washington, DC, Tyrus Fain, a co-chair of Big Bend Border Council released a list of sixteen “requirements” the US State Department says must be fulfilled before the bridge linking Brewster County’s heath canyon to La Linda, Coahuila can be reopened. Principal among them are “consolidation of bridge and adjoining lands ownership” and an agreement from the Department of Homeland security to staff an inspection facility at the bridge site.  Read more…


One of the world’s most celebrated rivers is almost gone

February 4, 2004

The Osgood File (CBS Radio Network)

There’s an old saying in Texas–whiskey is for drinking and water is for fighting. No one’s reached for their six-guns yet, but nowhere is the verbal sparring more intense over water than in the lower Rio Grande Valley. The reason? That great icon of the old west, the Rio Grande River, is drying up. At best, a bare trickle of river water is all that reaches its natural terminus, the Gulf of Mexico. Further upstream, slower, shallower flow is concentrating pollutants and endangering wildlife. The culprits include a long-term drought, wasteful water practices by agriculture, and poor management of available water. As the drought continues, so does the demand for water. The Valley is experiencing explosive growth, and is home to many of the fastest growing cities in both the U.S. and Mexico. The total population of the Valley has doubled from 1.1 million to more than 2.2 million since 1970. And it’s expected to double again by 2030.

There was a time when snowmelt from the mountains of southern Colorado provided ample water to the Rio Grande, which winds its way through Colorado and New Mexico, then into Texas, forming the Texas-Mexican border, before flowing into the Gulf of Mexico. For the last ten or 15 years no water from snowmelt has made it to the Lower Rio Grande. Indeed, last June the San Antonio Express newspaper reported this: “For the first time in more than 50 years, the flow of Rio Grande water through the majestic canyons of Big Bend National Park has dried up. . . . springs and occasional rises have kept some areas in the park flowing, but in other stretches the once-mighty Rio Grande is a series of stagnant pools separated by stretches of dry gravel.”

Two other rivers that dump into the Rio Grande, Mexico’s Rio Conchos, and Texas’s Pecos River have also experienced drought and, in the case of the Conchos, pressure from population increase and the demands of agriculture in Mexico. Lately the Mexican government has been violating an international agreement and holding back much of the river’s allocation that is supposed to go to the Rio Grande, say Mitchell Mathis and Tyrus Fain, two experts on the Rio Grande.

What little water there is, is being used inefficiently, but there is a solution. The standard farming practice is to use open furrow flooding of fields, which allows for quick evaporation and seepage into the ground. Agriculture uses 85 percent of the available river water; individuals and communities use the rest. Dr. Mitchell Mathis, an environmental economist who specializes in natural resource and environmental policy, directed an international study on the Lower Rio Grande to determine how much water agriculture would have to give up to accommodate increasing population. The answer, it turns out, is “not much.” A reduction in the range of nine to 15 percent would support the Valley’s projected population growth through the year 2030.

But big problems remain. Conservation costs money. Farmers won’t pay; either will anybody else. Further, says Tyrus Fain, president of the nonprofit Rio Grande Institute (an organization which fosters appreciation of the unique economic, cultural and natural resources of the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo basin), water management of the Rio Grande is “a nightmare.” Fain (and Mathis) notes there are local, state, regional, and federal agencies, three Mexican states, and six Indian tribes involved in managing the river’s water. There are water agreements that have been in effect since the early 1900s that beg for renegotiating, but, says Fain, “all politics are local. All the energy goes not into saving the river, but into fighting for who gets what.”

CONTACTS

Mitchell Mathis: Environmental Economist
Houston Advanced Research Center
4800 Research Forest Drive
The Woodlands, TX 77381
Phone: (281) 364-4023

Tyrus G. Fain: President
The Rio Grande Institute
Marathon, TX 79842
Phone: (915) 386-4336

LINKS

The Osgood File

WCBS Newsradio 880 in New York City features an archive of transcripts of stories broadcast on The Osgood File.

The Houston Advanced Research Center is a nonprofit organization based in The Woodlands, Texas, dedicated to improving human and ecosystem well being. The organization’s Web site includes an article on water management.

The Rio Grande Institute fosters appreciation of the unique economic, cultural and natural resources of the Rio Grande/Rio Bravo basin and promotes conservation of its resources.

America’s River Communities (ARC) is an organization of river-based nonprofits dedicated to educating the public about the challenges facing them. This organization is developing a PBS film on the Rio Grande.

Borderland’s Information Center Web site provides information on the Texas/Mexico border region.

Sabal Palm Audubon Center is on the Rio Grande along the US Mexico border that has a bird sanctuary threatened by a lack of Rio Grande water.

Bentsen-Rio Grande Valley State Park is also threatened by lack of river water.

United States Geological Survey (USGS) provides information on Rio Grande Valley, Texas.

This is a study on pollution in the Rio Grande from Trade and Environmental Database group (TED).

Texas Environmental Almanac


Editorial: Rio Grande Needs Help to Stay Afloat

February 2, 2004

San Antonio Express-News

For the first time in more than 50 years, the flow of Rio Grande water through the majestic canyons of Big Bend National Park has dried up.  As Express-News staff writer John MacCormack reported recently, springs and occasional rises have kept some areas in the park flowing, but in other stretches the once-mighty Rio Grande is a series of stagnant pools separated by stretches of dry gravel.  Read more…


Tamarisk Education on the Forgotten River -DRAFT

January 29, 2004

The Rio Grande Institute

The Rio Grande Institute of the Public Policy Information Fund, a 501(c)(3) non-profit Texas corporation, seeks to draw upon the research and educational resources of government agencies and universities to bring to high school biology classrooms in Far West Texas a curriculum that includes hands-on examination of the dynamics and impacts of invasive plant species along the Rio Grande, especially tamarisk, or salt cedar. With the assistance of agency scientists and advanced students, classroom teachers and lab instructors will explore the causes and impacts of tamarisk infestation, brainstorm possible solutions, and participate in a pilot eradication and native re-vegetation program. Students also have the opportunity to become EPA-certified in Quality Assurance techniques. This rich scientific experience and interaction with professional scientists, both in the classroom and on field trips, can allow students in this historically underserved region to better understand some practical applications of science.  Read more (MS Word Doc)…


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.